https://hscience.org/index.php/hij <div class="about_site"> <p><strong>ISSN:</strong>2821-3300</p> <p><strong>DOI: 10.14331/hij</strong><br /><strong>Aims and Scope</strong></p> <p><strong>Call for Papers – September 2025 Issue</strong><br />The <strong><em>Hyperscience International Journal (HIJ)</em></strong> is a nonprofit, peer-reviewed, open-access journal publishing high-quality research in Physics, Astronomy, Mathematics, Computational Science, Biology, and Interdisciplinary Studies. All articles receive a <strong>Crossref DOI</strong>, are indexed in <strong>Google Scholar,</strong> and benefit from fast peer review <strong>(2–4 weeks)</strong>.</p> <p data-start="1683" data-end="1728"> </p> <p data-start="1683" data-end="1728"><strong data-start="1686" data-end="1726">===== NOTICE ON AUTHOR REGISTRATION POLICY ======</strong></p> <p data-start="1735" data-end="1914">To ensure the <strong data-start="1749" data-end="1790">security, authenticity, and integrity</strong> of the Hyperscience International Journal (HIJ) submission system, <strong data-start="1858" data-end="1911">direct author self-registration has been disabled</strong>. All new user accounts are now created and verified <strong data-start="1972" data-end="1998">by the Journal Manager</strong>. Editors or Section Editors may register user accounts for reviewers when necessary. Authors who wish to submit manuscripts should contact the HIJ Editorial Office at <strong data-start="2185" data-end="2213"><a class="decorated-link cursor-pointer" rel="noopener" data-start="2187" data-end="2211">[email protected] </a></strong>for registration and submission guidance.</p> <p><strong>NOTE: The Journal Manager will register all user accounts. Editors or Section Editors may register user accounts for reviewers.</strong></p> </div> Hyperjournal en-US Hyperscience International Journal 2821-3300 https://hscience.org/index.php/hij/article/view/171 <p>This study presents a theoretical framework of gravitational-aether dynamics to explain the anomalously high surface temperature of Venus. The model links planetary rotation rate to an internal coupling between gravitational and electromagnetic fields, suggesting that slow rotation reduces outward energy dissipation and increases internal heat retention. A potential-based formulation is developed, combining an inner harmonic potential (valid inside a uniform-density sphere) and an outer hyperbolic potential (applicable beyond the surface). The transition between these regimes defines a differentiable “potential well” that corresponds to the region of maximum gravitational time dilation and energy concentration. By extending this framework thermodynamically, the minimization of gravitational potential is shown to correspond to entropy maximization, connecting planetary rotation, aether dynamics, and heat equilibrium. The results suggest that Venus’s extreme surface temperature may arise naturally from this aether-mediated force unification, offering an alternative interpretation to purely radiative or greenhouse explanations.</p> Muhammad Aslam Musakhail James Russell Farmer* Copyright (c) 2025 Hyperscience International Journal https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 2025-09-30 2025-09-30 5 3 51 62 10.55672/hij2025pp51-62 https://hscience.org/index.php/hij/article/view/183 <p>The Earth Similarity Index (ESI) is a quantitative metric designed to evaluate how closely an exoplanet resembles Earth based on key physical parameters. This study conducts a comparative assessment of four ESI calculation methods: the Radius–Flux method (ESI(R-F)), the Ratio and Exponent Method (ESI(REM)), the Weighted Difference Method (ESI(WDM)), and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (ESI(AHP)). These approaches incorporate combinations of planetary radius, density, escape velocity, surface temperature, and stellar flux, normalized to Earth standards. The manuscript systematically derives each method, applies them to hypothetical exoplanets, and extends calculations to a large sample of observed planets. Results show that the four methods vary in sensitivity to planetary parameters, with ESI(AHP) offering structured weighting and ESI(WDM) allowing more flexible parametrization. The comparative evaluation highlights the strengths and limitations of each method for identifying potentially habitable exoplanets. This work contributes to improving multi-criteria assessments of planetary Earth-likeness and provides a foundation for future refinement of habitability indices.</p> Bijan Nikouravan Copyright (c) 2025 Hyperscience International Journal https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 2025-09-30 2025-09-30 5 3 63 69 10.55672/hij2025pp63-69